|
This article explores how Nature-based Solutions (NbS)
often involve complex trade-offs that can create or exacerbate social and
ecological injustices— especially when justice considerations are limited
to human interests. It introduces a multispecies justice lens, expanding
the scope of who and what deserves ethical consideration in NbS planning.
By challenging assumptions around instrumentality, neutrality, consensus,
and time, the authors argue for more reflexive, inclusive, and ecologically
grounded decision-making.
|
